Between Delphi rounds, the baton is passed as ingredients from the content of the previous round are picked for the questions and ”votes” of the next round. New openings are mined from the panelists’ comments, which expand or deepen the handling of the phenomenon. In addition, contentious issues from the original question formulations are carried forward, whose discussion divides opinions in a way that necessitates further discussion. The same question content but from a different perspective may lead the discussion to a new phase, where dispute is replaced by dialogue. In the recycling of questions and queries (iteration), it is about peeling the onion, as per the familiar analogy. Facilitated by the manager, discussion and argumentation evolve and mature. Often, the original contentious question softens into a nuanced weighing of different aspects of the phenomenon and eventually into a solution-focused (relative) consensus on the best path forward, which is the goal of the so-called classical Delphi (Classical Delphi).